Power-to-Lock vs Power-to-Unlock: Choosing the Safer Safety Switch for Machine Guarding

By:

In today’s high-risk manufacturing environments, machine safety is not just about guarding—it’s about intelligent, fail-safe control systems that protect human life. Among the most critical components of a machine safety system is the safety interlock switch. Specifically, Keyence’s safety switches offer advanced functionality that supports both power-to-lock and power-to-unlock configurations. But which is safer? When should you use one over the other? And how do these choices impact access during operation or in emergencies?

This guide will clarify the differences between power-to-lock and power-to-unlock safety switches, evaluate which is safer for personnel, and outline best practices for access control during machine operation and emergency escape solutions.

What Are Keyence Safety Interlock Switches?

Keyence, a global leader in factory automation, offers advanced interlock switches designed to meet international safety standards (ISO 14119, ISO 13849-1, IEC 61508). These switches are engineered to monitor and control access to hazardous areas of machinery, ensuring that access is only permitted under safe conditions.

Keyence interlock switches typically feature:

  • Solenoid locking mechanisms

  • Electromagnetic actuation (power-to-lock or power-to-unlock)

  • High locking force (up to 3000 N)

  • Status indicators

  • Escape release and override options

  • PL e / SIL 3 compliance when integrated properly

Understanding the Two Main Types: Power-to-Lock vs Power-to-Unlock

1. Power-to-Lock (PTL) Switches

Definition: In a power-to-lock system, the solenoid must be energized to lock the actuator (keep the guard door closed). When power is lost or shut off, the switch automatically unlocks.

Advantages:

  • Fail-safe for emergencies: If there is a power outage, the door unlocks automatically, enabling workers to escape or enter safely.

  • Easy access during shutdowns or faults

  • Lower risk of entrapment

Disadvantages:

  • Unintended access risk: In the event of an unintentional power loss, the system could unlock and expose moving parts.

  • Not ideal for processes that require guard doors to remain locked under all conditions

Applications:

  • Appropriate for non-inertia or low-hazard systems

  • Used where quick egress in a power-down event is critical

2. Power-to-Unlock (PTU) Switches

Definition: In a power-to-unlock system, the solenoid must be energized to unlock the actuator (allow the guard door to open). When power is off, the system remains locked.

Advantages:

  • Fail-to-lock behavior: During power loss, the guard remains locked, maintaining protection from hazardous motion or inertia.

  • Ideal for high-risk or rotating machinery

  • Best for heavy or hazardous processes with run-down time

Disadvantages:

  • Risk of operator entrapment if inside the cell during power loss

  • Requires additional emergency escape or trapped key systems for safety

Applications:

  • Perfect for hazardous machines with dangerous inertia

  • Ideal for robotic cells, CNC machines, presses, and conveyors

Which System is Safer?

The safer system depends on the machine’s risk profile.

CriteriaPower-to-Lock (PTL)Power-to-Unlock (PTU)
Fail-Safe AccessUnlocks during power lossRemains locked
Guard IntegrityUnlocks during faultsRemains locked
Risk of EntanglementReduced during power-offIncreased unless managed
High-Inertia HazardsNot safeIdeal
Emergency Escape Required?RecommendedMandatory

Verdict:

  • Use Power-to-Lock switches for low-inertia, low-risk systems where safe escape is a priority.

  • Use Power-to-Unlock switches for high-risk, hazardous applications where guard containment is critical, but ensure emergency escape solutions are implemented.

Providing Safe Access During Operation

Whether you're using a PTL or PTU safety switch, access during operation must never compromise operator safety or machine integrity. Here are a few best practices for controlled access:

1. Request-to-Enter System

Integrate a two-step access protocol:

  • Operator requests access via HMI or push button

  • PLC initiates machine rundown and verifies safe conditions before unlocking

2. Time-Delay Unlocking

Use a time-delay release on a PTU switch to allow dangerous motion to stop fully before permitting access.

3. Guard Lock Monitoring

Ensure the switch supports lock status monitoring and ties back to the safety PLC or controller. Keyence’s GS and GS-M series include safety-rated lock monitoring contacts.

4. External Device Monitoring (EDM)

Confirm the safety relay or PLC monitors the entire chain:

  • E-stops

  • Guard doors

  • Lock/unlock status

  • Reset conditions

Emergency Escape Release: A Life-Saving Feature

Any safety system that could trap a person inside a hazardous area must include a means of emergency escape.

How Escape Releases Work:

  • Installed inside the guarded area

  • Mechanically overrides the locking mechanism

  • Can be illuminated or labeled for visibility in low-light conditions

  • Some versions are tamper-resistant to avoid misuse

Options for Keyence Switches:

  • GS-M Series supports built-in emergency release

  • Use a separate mechanical emergency release handle for basic models

  • Escape releases may be resettable from outside the guard

Real-World Application Example

Scenario: Robotic Welding Cell

  • Machine has high-speed moving parts with high run-down time

  • Operators occasionally perform cleaning inside the cell

  • Access must only be granted after shutdown is confirmed

Recommended Solution:

  • Keyence Power-to-Unlock switch

  • Integrated with time-delay logic to account for run-down time

  • Emergency escape release installed inside the cell

  • Access request HMI triggers lock release only when all safe conditions are verified

System Integration with PowerSafe Automation

At PowerSafe Automation, our TÜV-certified safety engineers specialize in designing and installing turnkey safety systems using power-to-lock and power-to-unlock technologies.

We provide:

  • Custom risk assessments to determine appropriate locking logic

  • Integration with Keyence safety switches

  • Installation of emergency escape releases

  • Functional safety validation to ISO 13849-1 / IEC 62061

  • Lockout/tagout integration and access controls

We also supply:

  • Guarding (aluminum extrusion, steel panels)

  • Electronic safety devices (light curtains, scanners)

  • Seal cabinets and conduit for IP-rated environments

  • Safety relays, PLCs, and status indicators

Conclusion

When deciding between a Keyence power-to-lock and power-to-unlock safety switch, you must consider:

  • The hazard level of your machine

  • Whether fail-safe access or fail-safe guarding is the top priority

  • The presence of personnel within a guarded area

  • Whether the application requires emergency escape options

There is no universal “safer” option—the correct switch depends on the risk context. However, PowerSafe Automation can help you determine the right solution, install it properly, and ensure you stay compliant with OSHA and ANSI standards.

Author